Search Results for: Exam Topics H19-410_V1.0 Pdf šŸ˜ Best H19-410_V1.0 Vce šŸ‘¹ H19-410_V1.0 New Dumps Ebook šŸ˜ Simply search for ā®† H19-410_V1.0 ā®„ for free download on āž„ www.pdfvce.com šŸ”„ šŸ‘æReal H19-410_V1.0 Braindumps

Beginnings and Endings: History Carnival 150

It’s been one month since I started my new job at the University of Essex. Settling in has been a busy and fun process. The moving company now tells me that my boxes should be in England by the weekend. One month and a new start in life has simply become life… Being in a reflective state of mind, I’ve chosen to focus this month’s History Carnival on the theme of beginnings and endings.

Students'_Union,_University_of_Essex,_across_Square_3

Let us begin, then, with a voyage. Over at Halley’s Log, Kate Morant has started blogging Edmond Halley’s third voyage on the Paramour (1701), this time to observe the tides in the English Channel–and maybe do some spying.

The ultimate traveller just might be Morrissey… or Richard III… who appears to have been doing some time travel. This is possibly my favourite tweet of the month. (Well, it’s technically from October rather than September, but it arrived just as I was writing this post.)

https://twitter.com/PhD_Angela/status/649535711578877952?ref_src=twsrc^tfw

And there is a great introduction to the artist Sonia Delaunay over at Art and Architecture, mainly where we learn about how she began a new life in a new city and took up new ways of doing art.

A big welcome to Sheilagh O’Brien who has just started blogging at Enchanted History! Her first post on marriage to the Devil couldn’t be timed more perfectly, being on the Essex witch trials and mentioning–of course–Colchester. There is more witchy history over at The Witch, the Weird and the Wonderful, where HJ Blenkinsop considers how the black cat became the witch’s familiar.

Jan van de Velde, 1626. A witch at her cauldron surrounded by beasts. Credit: Wellcome Library, London.

Jan van de Velde, 1626. A witch at her cauldron surrounded by beasts. Credit: Wellcome Library, London.

A cracking criminal tale from Catherine Curzon at A Covent Gardern Gilfurt’s Guide to Life. In 1807, Strasbourg residents were being subjected to a new and elaborate con in which a gang of thieves played the roles of exorcist, devil and prophetess to dupe their victims.

Where there are thieves, there must be those who pursue them. Margaret Makepeace at Untold Lives tells us the story of the Metropolitan Police’s first-ever day on the job… that came complete with a review of their performance in theĀ Morning Post the day after!

There are some great posts from historians reflecting on the profession and practice of doing history. Brodie Waddell at The Many-Headed Monster has a series of posts considering what problems exist in the history profession–specifically about training doctoral students and the casualisation of labour. In this post, he has “Seven Practical Steps” for what we can do to improve it.

Johann Staininger, a man with a very long beard. Credit: Wellcome Library, London.

Johann Staininger, a man with a very long beard. Credit: Wellcome Library, London.

It’s not all doom and gloom, of course. Sometimes it’s a bit fuzzy. Congratulations to Alun Withey who has just launched his new project on beards in history, which he introduces over here.

From Victorians’ facial hair, it is but a short hop to Jacob Steere-Williams’ post at Renaissance Mathematicus, in which he critiques the “privileged hipsters living the solipsist dream of a phantasmagorical Victorian world in the twenty-first century.”

Steere-Williams argues that simply wearing nineteenth-century clothes and using nineteenth-century technology is an insufficient–even dangerous–start to understanding Victorian experience. This is “far from an inocuous appropriation of powerless objects from the past. There is a very real danger in a cherry-picked, tunnel-vision of history, one that ignores power, inequality, racism and privilege.”

Along the same lines, Matt Champion’s evocative post at the Norfolk Medieval Graffiti Survey points out that

it isn’t enough to simply record what we find on the walls. It is a start. No more than that. The key though has to be understanding what we are seeing. To try and find our way into the mindset and motivations of the long-dead who left these tantalising messages for the future.

Silences as a way into a field of study, or a block to that study, is the theme of “The Truth about Child Sexual Assault” (1900-1950) by Mark Finnane and Yorrick Smaal at The Prosecution Project. What might be a tantalising start when studying graffiti is the frustrating (possible) end here. As Finnane and Smaal note: “The consequences of this silence continue to frustrate scholarly research.”

Henry Heath, 1841. Three dandies smoking and drinking coffee. Credit: Wellcome Library, London.

Henry Heath, 1841. Three dandies smoking and drinking coffee. Credit: Wellcome Library, London.

It is Welcome Week here at the University of Essex and my mind is filled with thoughts of the teaching to come next week. The Recipes Project has been running a great series on teaching historical recipes throughout the month of September, but let me draw your attention to Carla Cevasco’s post on “Teaching High School American History with Cookbooks“. It’s a fascinating post about introducing students to recipes for the first time, as well as the intersection of (for example) immigration policy, food cultures and anxiety.

But who needs university anyway? (Shhh. Let’s not tell the government, who is already in the process of dismantling UK academia.) Thony Christie looks at “The Penny Universities”, or how the first coffee houses in Britain became places where one could attend lectures by paying a penny–the price of a cup of coffee. While I like coffee (occasionally), I’m not sure that this would put bread on my table.

As every teacher knows, term time has its ups and downs. At some point, stimulants and tonics will be needed. D. Brooks at Friends of Schoharie Crossing takes a look at Hostetter’s Stomach Bitters, good

For the cure of Dyspepsia, Indigestion, Nausea, Flatulency, Loss of Appetite, or any Bilious Complaints, arising from a morbid inaction of the Stomach or Bowels, producing Cramps, Dysentery, Colic, Cholera, Morbus, &c., these Bitters have no equal.

Pharmacy jar, used for nerve ointment, The Netherlands, 1730. Credit: Science Museum, London.

Pharmacy jar, used for nerve ointment, The Netherlands, 1730.
Credit: Science Museum, London.

And with some 47% alcohol. A better bet than (at least the initial runs of) The Cereal Beverage” offered by the Chemung Beverage Company in 1927. Kelli Huggins (Chemung County Historical Society blog) discusses how the cereal beverage rapidly became a bit more high-powered, despite it being illegal. The “near beer” of Schenectady, as described at the Grems-Doolittle Library Collections blog, would also be a bit disappointing… Coffee it is, then. And maybe some bitters, too.

While thinking about the rhythms of the academic year, it’s worth reading this post on the traditional calendar in West Virginia by Danna Bell at the Library of Congress on “Finding Traditions: Exploring the Seasonal Round“. What is beginning now will end in only ten weeks, followed by grading, research and Christmas holidays, only to begin again in January…

And next month, there will be yet another History Carnival, this time hosted by Sharon Howard over at Early Modern Notes… so start saving up your posts, just as the West Virginians will be preserving foodstuffs. See you there!

 

 

Choosing the Countryside: Women, Health and Power in the Eighteenth Century

To honour International Womenā€™s Day today, I have decided to return to my roots as a womenā€™s historian. I first became a historian for feminist reasons: to recover womenā€™s past and to understand the relationships among culture, body, gender, and status.

The control women had over their bodies has often been a staple topic of feminism and womenā€™s medical history. We love to dig out (largely nineteenth and twentieth century) stories about the horrors inflicted upon womenā€™s bodies: clitorodectomies, forced sterilisation, and more. They make for chilling telling. Or perhaps we look back to Antiquity: women as monsters or inferior, inverted men. We find the tales about menstrual blood being poisonous. Itā€™s easy, surrounded by such stories, to assume that the goal of medicine has been about controlling women.

But the reality is far more complicated.

In the early eighteenth century, the misogynistic medical theories of inferiority, for example, were seldom practiced. All bodies were treated as humoral bodies, with specific temperaments that were individual to a patient. Medicine was highly interventionist (and often ineffective) for both sexes. And, more to the point, medical practitioners were dependent on their patients for success. This was not just in terms of payment or patronage.[1] . In an age before anaesthesia, or even stethoscopes, doctors and surgeons were unable to look inside the living body: patientsā€™ stories were invaluable tools in diagnosis. Women could have much control over their own health.

Promising? Not exactly. These womenā€™s choices were still limited in a multitude of ways. The ability to make decisions about oneā€™s own body, whether historically or today, is an important marker of womenā€™s equality. An old argument, perhaps, but one that is as true now as ever. When talking about control in the modern world, it often comes down to topics such as abortion or female genital mutilation. The dullness of day-to-day inequality is easy to overlook when there are more pressing issues.

Back in the eighteenth century, the fundamental inequalities within society can often be seen within the household. Women might, for example, have been well-treated by physiciansā€“but, as letters to physician Hans Sloane show, their ability to make medical decisions was limited by something even more fundamental: access to money.

John Constable, Wivenhoe Park, Essex (1816). From: National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C., USA (Wikimedia Commons).

A husband could decide when and how a woman saw a doctor. In 1715, physician William Lilly commented that his patient Lady Suffolk was well enough to travel to London from her countryside residence in order to see Sloane, but only ā€œif my Lord thinks fitt to bring herā€.[2] Even when a Ā woman was pleased with her medical care, her husband might choose another course of treatment, as one unnamed doctor complained. He had been treating Lady Salisbury in 1727, who agreed with his recommendation that she should go to the countryside while she recuperated. Lord Salisbury, however, had other ideas. He dismissed the unnamed physician, instead turning over his wifeā€™s care to Dr. Hale. No reasons were given for the change.[3]

Whether or not a woman received care was also up to her husband. Although the head of a household was obliged to provide medical care for everyone within it, the extent of the care needed was open to dispute.[4] Mrs A. Smith, for example, found that her treatments in Bath were useful, but her husband refused to continue paying. Someone, she believed, ā€œhas told Mr Smith that I am very well and I only pretend illness to stay in Towneā€. Her dependence on Mr Smithā€™s decisions was clear. She noted that she was unhappy, since ā€œall my Ease depends a pone Mr Smithā€™s opinion of meā€. Worried that she would become more ill if her husband sent her to the countryside, she begged Sloane to intervene by ā€œtell[ing] him how you thinke meā€.[5]

Family members might try to help if they believed a womanā€™s health was being affected by her husbandā€™s choices, but this was complicated and not always successful. The law, after all, ultimately upheld the power of a husband over his wife. Jane Roupell wrote to Sloane about her daughter, Lady Anne Ilay, on the grounds that her son-in-law had weakened her daughterā€™s health through his lack of care. Mrs. Roupell asked if Sloane might visit before seeing her daughter, so she could ā€œtell you somthings that she is ashamed to tell her selfeā€. It would be best, she thought, if her daughter could recover away from her husband–perhaps, she suggested, Sloane might recommend that Lady Ilay be sent to the countryside.[6]

The countryside in these four letters becomes alternatively a place of health, a place of isolation or a place of refuge. Although weā€™ve moved on a lot since the eighteenth century, there are two basic womenā€™s health issues that underpinned these seemingly simple disputes about going to the countryside: access to health care and finances.

Most often, the Sloane correspondence provides examples of womenā€™s families wanting the best for their wives and daughters, but women were always in precarious positions. Each woman came from a wealthy background and had doctors (such as Sloane) who were potential allies, but as the cases show, women could not simply choose what treatment they wanted without consulting their families. One thing was clear: it was ultimately up to their husbands what a womanā€™s medical treatment should be.



[1] See for example, Wendy Churchill, Female Patients in Early Modern Britain (Ashgate, 2012).

[2] British Library Sloane MS 4076, f. 14, 28 July 1715.

[3] British Library Sloane MS 4078, f. 304, 26 March 1727/8.

[4] Catherine Crawford, ā€œPatientsā€™ Rights and the Law of Contract in Eighteenth-century Englandā€, Social History of Medicine 13 (2000): 381-410.

[5] British Library Sloane MS 4077, f. 37, n.d.

[6] British Library Sloane MS 4060, f. 203, f. 204, n.d.

A longer version of this argument appears in: L.W. Smith, ā€œReassessing the Role of the Family: Womenā€™s Medical Care in Eighteenth-Century Englandā€, Social History of Medicine 16, 3 (2003): 327-342.

Choose search method

There are two ways to search.

Depending on how you want to use this resource, you can either jump straight to the letter you want to read (if you know its number) ā€“ or you can launch our letter browser, which lets you explore all the content.

Letter Browser

Click below to launch the letter browser.

Load the browser

Loading Letter browser.

We’re loading the letter browser!

Did you know the Sloane Letters database contains over 4,000 letters?

ellipsis

Enter Letter number

 

Search by Numbers

When entering the letter ID, all digits of the letter must be used, including any zeros at the start. That means 79 should be entered as 0079 and 179 as 0179.

 

Using the Letter Browser

The Letter Browser is an excellent way to gather information for a research project, as a starting point for a research question, or as a quick way to gather information for an essay. You can also launch the letter browser to search by manuscript number or Letter ID.

To limit your searches, you can use AND or OR between words or double quotations around a specific word or phrase like “this” that you want to find. From the search page, you can also check off whether you want to search letters only, or other types of information (such as people and blog posts). You can also limit your queries using the category and listed subject options.

If you have already identified a useful letter via a footnote or reference, you can search by manuscript and folio reference. For example, if you wanted to view the entry for Sloane MS 4037, f. 141, enter 4037 AND 141. If you want to look through the letters in Sloane MS 4037, just enter “MS 4037” (making sure to use the double quotation marks).

You can also use the letter ID search from the letter browser to jump directly to a numbered letters that you have already identified as useful.

If you would like to browse the entire collection, then just launch the letter browser and do not enter any search terms.

 

Categories and Subjects

You can search using keywords that you want to find, as described above. In the database, you will find references to names (places, people mentioned, authors, patients), medical occupations, ailments, and more. The category and subject lists provide a good overview of the letters, but it is not exhaustive.

The categories were chosen based on the major themes arising in Sloane’s correspondence. The range of topics reflects Sloane’s social life, charitable activities, intellectual interests, and professional roles and offices. The letters are particularly strong on:

  • the intellectual world, whether about publication, scholarship, or scientific practices
  • medicine, which primarily deals with cases for consultation;
  • curiosities, both objects and medical or non-medical reports of wide interest;
  • sociability and patronage, such as networks between people and personal relationships;
  • collections, including the process of collecting and other collectors;
  • objects, both in terms of material history and the trade of commodities.

The subject list is even wider and describes the contents of letters. For example, it is possible to find subjects ranging from book titles, political events, geographical locations, ethnicities, foreign academies, languages, or autopsies.

The medical problem list is a folksonomy, which is derived from early modern categories and understandings of disease, as well as the descriptions or diagnoses given in the letters. Specifically, the list of ailments focuses on symptoms and body parts.

Age
Apoplexy
Back
Breasts
Cancer
Childbirth
Childhood Diseases
Colds
Colics
Consumptions
Coughs
Dizziness
Ears
Emotions
Epilepsy
Eyes
Fevers
Genitals
Gout
Greensickness
Haemorrhoids
Head
Headache
Heart
Hydropsy
Hypochondria
Hysteria
Impotence
Inflammations
Injuries (including sores and bruises)
Jaundice
Kidney (including ā€œrunning of the reins,ā€ which could be uncontrolled urination or a regular genital discharge)
Liver
Lungs
Melancholy
Menstrual
Migraine
Mouth
Nerves
Nose
Numbness
Other
Pain
Palsy
Paralysis
Pregnancy
Rheumatism
Skin Ailments
Smallpox
Spleen
Stomach (including bowels)
Stone
Stupor
Teeth
Throat
Tumour
Urinary
Vapours
Venereal
Wasting

 

Letter 4101

J. Bradley to Howard – Apr-16


Item info

Date: Apr-16
Author: J. Bradley
Recipient: Howard

Library: British Library, London
Manuscript: MS 4066
Folio: f. 269



Original Page



Transcription

[…] Howard I desire you’ll […] Sr Hans Sloan’s who lives near Bloomsbury Square & if he is within give my service & tell him that I sent you for some Papers that I was inform’d he had received from Italy which related to me. You need not go till between three & four of clock ….. you will scarce fail of meeting with him. If he should not [be?] come in when you are there but is soon expected I desire you’ll stay & if you get ye Papers send them by ye Coach & I will satisfie you for your trouble when I see you next Yours [?] J. Bradley

Rev. J. Bradley (‘James Petiver, FRS Apothecary to the Charter-House: Miscellaneous correspondence’ British Library [http://searcharchives.bl.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?dscnt=1&fromLogin =true&doc=IAMS040-002116460&displayMode=full&dstmp=1432649891937&vid=IAMS_ VU2&ct=display&tabs=detailsTab&fromLogin=true&fromLogin=true, accessed 16 July 2015]) asks Mr Howard (unspecified), to speak to Sir Hans Sloane on his behalf and offer his services to him. Bradley asks Howard to collect papers, which Sloane received from Italy as they relate to him.




Patient Details

Letter 4102

Ad. Buddle to Petiver – Tuesday morning eleven of ye clock


Item info

Date: Tuesday morning eleven of ye clock
Author: Ad. Buddle
Recipient: Petiver

Library: British Library, London
Manuscript: MS 4066
Folio: f. 283



Original Page



Transcription

Mr Petiver Your company is desired at six of ye clock this evening at ye grey-hound Tavern by salisbury court in fleet street you will be sure to meet Mr [Lerhet?] & my self; perhaps Dr Nicholson & Mr Doody Yours Ad. Buddle Tuesday morning eleven of ye clock

Adam Buddle informs Mr. Petiver that his “company is desired at … ye grey-hound Tavern by salisbury court in fleet street[.]” There is a lengthy postscript attached to the end of this letter, which carries over onto the envelope. In the postscript, Buddle mentions his brother. It appears that Buddle also mentions Mr Airy, Mr Bradies and his grandmother but the text is somewhat illegible making it difficult to confirm. In addition, Buddle mentions payments and bonds but little else can be gathered from the postscript, as the text is largely unintelligible. Adam Buddle (bap. 1662, d. 1715) was a botanist and an ordained minister with the Church of England. While living in Henley, Suffolk, Buddle corresponded with James Petiver and Samuel Doody. Buddle had an impressive collection of mosses and grasses that he lent to Petiver and Doody, which were later passed on to Tournefort and Bobart. Buddle also acquired several specimens of English flora, which he bequeathed to Sloane. (James Britten, ‘Buddle, Adam (bap. 1662, d. 1715)’, rev. Janet Browne, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004 [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/3883, accessed 22 June 2015])




Patient Details

Letter 4105

William Stukeley to Hans Sloane – July 7 1733


Item info

Date: July 7 1733
Author: William Stukeley
Recipient: Hans Sloane

Library: British Library, London
Manuscript: Sloane MS 4053
Folio: f. 5-6



Original Page



Transcription

Dr William Stukeley writes to Sloane describing the return of his gout and how he is treating it with Dr. Rogers’s Oils. His pain has come and gone in the past year and recently came back violently. He vouches for Rogers’s remedy and says there are many other patients that do as well. William Stukeley was an antiquary and natural philosopher. He studied medicine at Corpus Christi, Cambridge and practiced medicine in London and Boston before setting up a practice in Grantham in 1726. Stukeley was acquainted with Dr Richard Mead, Sir Hans Sloane, Edmond Halley, and other prominent intellectuals and was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1718. He published several medical treatises and important texts on the stone circles at Stonehenge and Avebury (David Boyd Haycock, Stukeley, William (16871765), Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004 [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/26743, accessed 19 Aug 2013]).




Patient Details

Letter 4103

Ad: Buddle to J. Petiver –


Item info

Date:
Author: Ad: Buddle
Recipient: J. Petiver

Library: British Library, London
Manuscript: MS 4066
Folio: f. 287



Original Page



Transcription

Buddle informs Petiver that his wife was “brought to bed this evening,” and “in ye morning I [Buddle] was in hast then coming for the midwife[.]” (bap. 1662, d. 1715) was a botanist and an ordained minister with the Church of England. While living in Henley, Suffolk, Buddle corresponded with James Petiver and Samuel Doody. Buddle had an impressive collection of mosses and grasses that he lent to Petiver and Doody, which were later passed on to Tournefort and Bobart. Buddle also acquired several specimens of English flora, which he bequeathed to Sloane. (James Britten, ‘Buddle, Adam (bap. 1662, d. 1715)’, rev. Janet Browne, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004 [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/3883, accessed 22 June 2015])




Patient Details

Letter 4104

Daniel Turner to Hans Sloane – July 2nd 1733


Item info

Date: July 2nd 1733
Author: Daniel Turner
Recipient: Hans Sloane

Library: British Library, London
Manuscript: Sloane MS 4053
Folio: f. 3



Original Page



Transcription

Turner Apologizes for his bookseller forgetting to send Sloane the book he has enclosed. Daniel Turner was admitted as a surgeon to the Barber-Surgeons’ Company of London in 1691. He participated in four dissections that were recorded and published in the Philosophical Transactions between 1693 and 1694. In 1711, after twenty years of practicing surgery, he was admitted as a licentiate of the Royal College of Physicians. Turner published treatises on the nature and place of surgery in medicine throughout his career and engaged in debates on the treatment of syphilis (Philip K. Wilson, Turner, Daniel (16671741), Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004; online edn, Jan 2008 [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/27844, accessed 15 Aug 2013]).




Patient Details

Letter 1410

Arthur Charlett to Hans Sloane – January 10 1708/09


Item info

Date: January 10 1708/09
Author: Arthur Charlett
Recipient: Hans Sloane

Library: British Library, London
Manuscript: Sloane MS 4041
Folio: ff. 267-268



Original Page



Transcription

Charlett introduced Lloyd and Isted to each other. He was told that Sloane is going to make a considerable donation of books to the public library. He agrees that the paper that Sloane asked about should be printed as the latter sees fit. Charlett was elected Master of University College at Oxford in 1692 and held that post until his death in 1722. Charlett used the mastership to gain influence, especially through persistent letter-writing to numerous correspondents, sharing the latest literary, political, and scholarly gossip (R. H. Darwall-Smith, Charlett, Arthur (16551722), Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004 [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/5158, accessed 1 June 2011]).




Patient Details

Letter 4100

Edw: Baynard to James Petiver – 12 at noon, Wensday


Item info

Date: 12 at noon, Wensday
Author: Edw: Baynard
Recipient: James Petiver

Library: British Library, London
Manuscript: MS 4066
Folio: f. 263



Original Page



Transcription

Dear Sir I desire you to be so kind, as to let me see you to morrow morning at ten a clock at this place, & to bring that letter with you send from Dr. Blaine (I thinke his name is) of Coupar in Angus & you will oblige your humble servant Edw: Baynard

Baynard requests a meeting with Mr. Petiver. Edward Baynard was a physician, poet, and Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians. He was a proponent of cold balneotherapy (Mark S. R. Jenner, Baynard, Edward (1641?1717), Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004; online edn, Jan 2008 [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/1771, accessed 19 June 2013]).




Patient Details