Search Results for: AZ-700-German Probesfragen 🎵 AZ-700-German Online Praxisprüfung 😍 AZ-700-German Tests 🆘 Suchen Sie einfach auf ▷ www.itzert.com ◁ nach kostenloser Download von [ AZ-700-German ] 😏AZ-700-German Ausbildungsressourcen

Letter 0854

William Derham to Hans Sloane – June 21, 1703


Item info

Date: June 21, 1703
Author: William Derham
Recipient: Hans Sloane

Library: British Library, London
Manuscript: Sloane MS 4039
Folio: ff. 151-152



Original Page



Transcription

[fol. 152] Sr Upminster D. Jun: 21. 1703. Upon what you were pleased to tell me at the last Meeting of the R. Society, I searched my Papers at my return Home, & find that I have sent you all my Registers of the Weather &, wth Remarks & Observations upon them. You have already published in the Transactions my Regrs of ye year 1697, 98 & 99. And those of 1700 & 1701 I sent you both together some time last year (I forget the particular time) with a Lr [letter] of the most usefull Deductions I could make concerning the Fertility [?], Health, or of those Years, as also some remarkable Phenomena of the Barometer. My Regr of 1702 I sent you about last March. These Larger Tables I fear may create more trouble to the Printer & Composer than they are woth. However having made them for my own diversion & satisfaction, I sent them to you, because you told requested me so to do; & told me that they should be reposited among the papers of the Society, to be of use perhaps at some time & to some body or other. Imagining thus that these Registers at large would hardly be printed, I made some extracts out of them, & joyned them with some of Mr Fenneleys observations of the same nature; wch I sent (with some other business) in a Lr to Mr Houghton for your use. Thus Sr I have given you a brief account of what hath been published of my weather & Observations & what is in your hands unpublished. And therein I have endeavoured to satisfy your request at our last meeting. If I have not, I shall rea- dily observe your commands, if you will be pleased to write to me by the General-Post to Rumford, because I have some business wch I fear will detain me from waiting upon you at the Society the two next Wednesdays I am told yt the Academy of Sciences have made some remarks on My Rain Observations, but cannot find any thing of it in Fenton- nellis [?] History. If you know any thing of yt matter, I am pleased to write, I desire the favour of you to tell me where I may meett with it. In wch you will add to the many obligations you have laid upon Sr Your faithful humble servant Wm Derham

Derham was a Church of England clergyman and a natural philosopher, interested in nature, mathematics, and philosophy. He frequently requested medical advice from Sloane, and likely served as a physician to his family and parishioners (Marja Smolenaars, “Derham, William (1657-1735)”, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004 [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/7528, accessed 7 June 2011]).




Patient Details

Letter 2627

Paul Lorrain to Hans Sloane – May 6, 1709


Item info

Date: May 6, 1709
Author: Paul Lorrain
Recipient: Hans Sloane

Library: British Library, London
Manuscript: Sloane MS 4076
Folio: f. 38



Original Page



Transcription

Honred. Next to my most humble & hearty Thanks to you for your great Care of, & trouble you are pleas’d so kindly to take about my poor Wife, give me leave to acquaint you, that she has taken twice ye last Potion you have prescribed for her, viz. that made of Cort. Peru, aq: Cer: nig &c But has forborn to take more till your farther Advice be know (wch, If you think fit I pray […] will send, without further trouble to your self) […..] her Feaver, is abated & her Fits have not [……..] since her last taking it; but chiefly because [……] menstrua are now come upon her. I am Hon’d Sir, Yor most humble & most obliged servt Paul Lorrain Frid. noon May 6 1709

Large tear on bottom left hand. Lovely note after address, ‘with care’.




Patient Details

Hans Sloane and the Pit

Headlines today: “‘Black Death pit’ unearthed by Crossrail project“. It’s all very exciting when London starts to dig deep under its surface, with various plague pits, Bronze Age transport networks and more being unearthed. I can’t help thinking, sometimes, that it’s only a matter of time before we have a Quatermass and the Pit situation!

In the eighteenth century, building on a plague pit was a matter of national concern. On 16 March 1723, The British Journal (iss. XXVI) reported that Richard Mead and Sloane had been consulted on the matter of Lord Craven wanting to build over the Pest-House Fields. As I’ve discussed before, Sloane–who was no less than a court physician and President of the Royal College of Physicians–and Mead had advised the government about preventing an outbreak in London during the Marseilles plague of 1720-22.

Human bones and skulls in a brick-built pit. Credit: Wellcome Library, London.

During the plague of 1665, William, 1st Earl of Craven, stayed in London as a member of a commission to prevent the plague’s spread. The commission recommended isolating the sick by setting up pest houses and burying the dead in plague pits. A few years after the outbreak (1671), Lord Craven purchased land near Lancaster Gate, with a Pest House Field for the use of nearby parishes: St. Paul, St. Clement Danes, St. Martin-in-the-Fields and St. James.By 1700, however, London was growing rapidly and, without a recent outbreak of the plague, the unused land was increasingly seen as a problem. In any case, with so many people around, it could no longer serve as a place of isolation if an epidemic did break out.[1]

The answer to Lord Craven’s question in 1723 was “no”. The physicians had apparently

determin’d, that the Digging them [the land] up might be of dangerous Consequence, there having been many hundred distemper’d Bodies buried there in the Plague Time.

With the memory of the Marseilles plague still fresh in people’s minds, this was probably not the best time for Lord Craven to ask! The fact that the plague experts Sloane and Mead were called in for a consultation suggests that the disposal of Lord Craven’s land was a matter of national importance. If meddling with the land could cause a plague outbreak, threatening the health of people and the economy, it should not be done.

Eleven years later, the family had greater success in determining the use of their land. Although the government did not consult Sloane and Mead this time, their decisions still erred on the side of caution. The government specified that only a hospital could be built on the site.

By the 1820s, the family had divided and leased the land, but a curious clause was written into the leases: the leasees were required to turn over the land for use during a plague outbreak. The definition of ‘plague’ was a bit ambiguous: did this refer only to plague or to any infectious disease? This became a pressing matter during the 1833 cholera epidemic, but fortunately for the tenants, the lease remained limited to plague. With plague deemed unlikely ever to happen again, a wealthy neighbourhood soon spread across the area.

Then and now, London is frequently faced with the problem of its multitude of inconvenient corpses. The ghost of the plague that haunted eighteenth-century London’s plague pits still peeks its head out every so often, but we can greet it with curiosity instead of fear.[2]

[1.] A short history of the Craven Estate can be read here: http://www.corringham.eu/cravenestate.html.

[2.] UPDATED 16 MARCH 2013: Some of us, anyhow. A slightly strange article in The Telegraph has taken the angle of trying to scare readers about the possible dangers posed by old plague pits. Darin Hayton has also picked up on some media hyperbole and commenter anxiety about the discovery, which he discusses in his post “A Dozen Medieval Plague Victims?”

Letter 3754

Johann Eberhard Rau to Hans Sloane – April 12, 1730


Item info

Date: April 12, 1730
Author: Johann Eberhard Rau
Recipient: Hans Sloane

Library: British Library, London
Manuscript: Sloane MS 4051
Folio: ff. 17-18



Original Page



Transcription

Johann Eberhard Rau (1695-1770) was a Protestant theologian and professor. He studied at the University of Marburg and was elected a member of the Royal Academy of Sciences in Berlin for his scientific achievements in 1729. He received a professorship at the University of Frankfurt in 1746 (Otto Friedrich, “Rau, Johann Eberhard”, in: General German Biography (1888), S. 379-380 [Online version]; URL: http://www.deutsche-biographie.de/pnd131494376.html?anchor=adb).




Patient Details

Missed Opportunities in Early Modern Exploration?

A map of "Terra Australis" by Jan Janssonius (1657). Credit: Wikimedia Commons. Uploaded by: Joop Rotte.

A map of “Terra Australis” by Jan Janssonius (1657). Credit: Wikimedia Commons. Uploaded by: Joop Rotte.

By Matthew De Cloedt

In early December 1721 James Brydges, the first Duke of Chandos, requested a meeting with Sir Hans Sloane. Brydges, a shareholder in chartered companies operating in New York, Mississippi, and Nova Scotia, wished to gain Sloane’s scientific expertise and advise an expedition of the Royal African Company headed by a “good Botanist” named Mr Hay. Brydges sent Francis Lynn, the company secretary, to Sloane’s residence three days later to answer his questions regarding the venture and to inform him of “the Nature of Drugs, plants, and spices” they were expecting to gather on the expedition.

Though the Royal African Company had lost its trading monopoly after the Glorious Revolution it continued to receive support from prominent individuals. Men like Brydges bet on its success, for the potential financial losses were negligible compared to the possible returns should a profitable, new commodity be discovered. Sloane was a natural choice for Brydges. He was wealthy thanks to his Jamaican interests, well connected to global trade networks, aware of the riches to be gained from botanical commerce, and friendly with the family of Brydges’s wife Cassandra Willughby. Sloane obliged Brydges’ request and directed company officials in Whydah to collect particular plant specimens. [1]

Sloane regularly received invitations to lend his scientific expertise or invest in business ventures. When he supported a person or company he connected them to a network that included the royal family and contacts around the world. Rejected proposals ended up in his large collection of manuscripts. Some of the more interesting schemes point to what might have been had Sloane seriously backed their proponents.

In the spring of 1716, shortly after he was created baronet, Sloane received a letter from Woodes Rogers asking for all the information he had on Madagascar. The Royal African Company had excluded individual traders from the West African coast, driving them to East African trade centres. English attempts had been made throughout the seventeenth century to establish meaningful trade in Madagascar, which was dominated by the Portuguese and Dutch, but they had little success. Rogers was determined to break into this market.

Rogers had already been a Colonial Governor and privateer in the Bahamas, but wanted to take on a more ambitious project in starting his own colony on Madagascar. There is no evidence that Sloane even replied, but his large library, reputation as a traveler and natural historian, and place within the scientific community attracted Rogers. It would not have been the first time Sloane helped a pirate.

John Welbe wrote several months after Rogers to request Sloane’s assistance. Welbe was in prison for a debt he failed to repay and promised to undertake a voyage to “Terra Australis Incognita” if Sloane helped him. Welbe had long been seeking a patron to support his voyage and forwarded a petition he had written to the Crown of Denmark as evidence. That Sloane was apparently Welbe’s second choice after the Danes indicates how great a patron he was considered to be, or how desperate Welbe was to be freed from bondage.

The unknown territory had been spotted before, but no serious attempt at settling there had been made. With Sloane’s help, Welbe might have gained the support of others with financial and/or natural historical interests in what became Australia, but nothing came of the plan. There is no evidence Sloane bailed Welbe out of prison or even replied to his letter, but in any case he did not sponsor any voyage to the “Terra Australis Incognita”. It would take another prominent Royal Society member, Joseph Banks, to really put Australia on the map.

With his busy medical practice and duties to the government, Royal Society, and Royal College of Physicians, Sloane was too busy to deal with all of the schemes proposed to him. But the map of the world by 1720 might have looked different if Sloane had chosen to throw the weight of the Royal Society and his social network behind Welbe or Rogers.

Counterfactuals aside, Sloane was an ideal patron for international scientific and commercial expeditions, for he had first hand experience. When he traveled to Jamaica in 1687 he was, like Mr Hay, a “good Botanist” trying to make a name for himself using science, commerce, and foreign travel as the foundation for a successful career. Understanding why Sloane ignored Welbe and Rogers might be simple. The two did acknowledge Sloane’s scientific expertise, but focused on securing his financial support. Sloane was not afraid of making money, but he was equally as interested in the opportunity to contribute to science through exploration and commerce. Appealing to this desire might have been the best approach.

[1] Larry Stewart, “The Edge of Utility: Slaves and Smallpox in the Early Eighteenth Century”, Medical History 29 (1985), 60-61.

Charles Deering

Charles Deering, (1695–1749), was a German botanist who lived and worked in England. He was an acquaintance of both Sloane and their mutual friend J. Dillenius. He was also a physician who developed a successful method of treating smallpox, but he ended up in poverty due to his short temper.

 

Reference:

Charles Deering to Hans Sloane, 1735-08-01, Sloane MS 4054, f. 86, British Library, London

Charles Deering, Wikipedia, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Charles_Deering, accessed 20/09/2017]

B. D. Jackson, ‘Deering, George Charles (1695?–1749)’, rev. D. E. Allen, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004 [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/7419, accessed 20 Sept 2017]

 



Dates: to

Occupation: Unknown

Relationship to Sloane: Virtual International Authority File:

Meyer Löw Schomburg

Meyer Löw Schomburg (1690-1761) was a German physician. He settled in London in 1721, treating the poor at the Great Synagogue. He was admitted a Licentiate of the Royal College of Physicians in 1722 and was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1726. In 1729 Schomburg tried to block the entry of his rival Jacob de Castro Sarmento into the Royal Society.

Reference:

Edgar Samuel, ‘Schomberg , Meyer Löw (1690–1761)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford University Press, 2004 http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/24826 [accessed 20 Aug 2014]).



Dates: to

Occupation: Unknown

Relationship to Sloane: Virtual International Authority File:

Letter 1245

Moise Pujolas to Hans Sloane – May 19, 1699


Item info

Date: May 19, 1699
Author: Moise Pujolas
Recipient: Hans Sloane

Library: British Library, London
Manuscript: Sloane MS 4037
Folio: ff. 270-271



Original Page



Transcription

After describing Pujolas’ health and treatment, Silvestre mentions his previous letter which contained a description of the lithotomy he observed. He is not able to find the books asked for in Brussels, but will look for them if he goes to Germany. His letter to Mery was printed, but so changed that he renounces the publication. If the letter is mentioned in the Philosophical Transactions he asks his renouncement be presented too. He thanks Sloane for introducing him into the Royal Society. He will send salt and preparations of the waters of Aix-la-Chapelle. Silvestre comments on the writings of local physicians. He wonders what can be added to their knowledge of the structure of the ear. Pujolas adds his thanks for Sloane’s friendship. Peter Silvestre (d. 1718) was a Fellow of the Royal Society and co-editor of Saint-Evremond’s works (Elizabeth Grist, ‘Rainbow Coffee House group (act. 1702–1730)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press. [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/theme/94590, accessed 14 June 2011]). Moise Pujolas (d. 1729) was a Huguenot refugee and clergyman. He was naturalised in Britain in 1696. Pujolas served as Secretary to the General Assembly of the French Churches in London and Governor of the Hospital for Poor French Protestants in 1728 (https://collections.royalsociety.org/DServe.exe?dsqIni=Dserve.ini&dsqApp=Archive&dsqCmd=Show.tcl&dsqDb=Persons&dsqPos=0&dsqSearch=%28Surname%3D%27pujolas%27%29).




Patient Details

  • Patient info
    Name: N/A Moise Pujolas
    Gender:
    Age:
  • Description

    Following an emotional upset he suffered from insomnia and strong headaches. Later he was nauseous. He had heart palpitations and an intermittent pulse while suffering from nerves. There was partial paralysis in an arm and a leg.

  • Diagnosis
  • Treatment
    Previous Treatment:

    He was first bled, then given salts and then mixtures to stimulate his heart (cordiales) as well as for his nerves (hysteriques). Lastly he was given steel (acier).


    Ongoing Treatment:

    The patient has taken the water for 8 days and the previous day began taking the baths at Aix-la-Chapelle, which he will do for some days after which he will take the water again.


    Response:

    The heaviness in his leg and arm are lessened and he is energized by the baths.

  • More information
  • Medical problem reference
    Paralysis, Insomnia, Palsy, Nerves, Heart, Headache, Stroke?

Letter 1244

Peter Silvestre to Hans Sloane – May 19, 1699


Item info

Date: May 19, 1699
Author: Peter Silvestre
Recipient: Hans Sloane

Library: British Library, London
Manuscript: Sloane MS 4037
Folio: ff. 270-271



Original Page



Transcription

After describing Pujolas’ health and treatment, Silvestre mentions his previous letter which contained a description of the lithotomy he observed. He is not able to find the books asked for in Brussels, but will look for them if he goes to Germany. His letter to Mery was printed, but so changed that he renounces the publication. If the letter is mentioned in the Philosophical Transactions he asks his renouncement be presented too. He thanks Sloane for introducing him into the Royal Society. He will send salt and preparations of the waters of Aix-la-Chapelle. Silvestre comments on the writings of local physicians. He wonders what can be added to their knowledge of the structure of the ear. Pujolas adds his thanks for Sloane’s friendship. Peter Silvestre (d. 1718) was a Fellow of the Royal Society and co-editor of Saint-Evremond’s works (Elizabeth Grist, ‘Rainbow Coffee House group (act. 1702–1730)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press. [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/theme/94590, accessed 14 June 2011]). Moise Pujolas (d. 1729) was a Huguenot refugee and clergyman. He was naturalised in Britain in 1696. Pujolas served as Secretary to the General Assembly of the French Churches in London and Governor of the Hospital for Poor French Protestants in 1728 (https://collections.royalsociety.org/DServe.exe?dsqIni=Dserve.ini&dsqApp=Archive&dsqCmd=Show.tcl&dsqDb=Persons&dsqPos=0&dsqSearch=%28Surname%3D%27pujolas%27%29).




Patient Details

  • Patient info
    Name: N/A Moise Pujolas
    Gender:
    Age:
  • Description

    Following an emotional upset he suffered from insomnia and strong headaches. Later he was nauseous. He had heart palpitations and an intermittent pulse while suffering from nerves. There was partial paralysis in an arm and a leg.

  • Diagnosis
  • Treatment
    Previous Treatment:

    He was first bled, then given salts and then mixtures to stimulate his heart (cordiales) as well as for his nerves (hysteriques). Lastly he was given steel (acier).


    Ongoing Treatment:

    The patient has taken the water for 8 days and the previous day began taking the baths at Aix-la-Chapelle, which he will do for some days after which he will take the water again.


    Response:

    The heaviness in his leg and arm are lessened and he is energized by the baths.

  • More information
  • Medical problem reference
    Paralysis, Insomnia, Palsy, Nerves, Heart, Headache, Stroke?

Letter 3256

Henry Jones to Hans Sloane – March 9, 1726


Item info

Date: March 9, 1726
Author: Henry Jones
Recipient: Hans Sloane

Library: British Library, London
Manuscript: Sloane MS 4048
Folio: ff. 139-140



Original Page



Transcription

Jones forwards a certificate to Sloane, signed by the Vice-Chancellor and two college heads. Jones does not know Sloane, but informs him the affair is an ‘affront to the Faculty’. He is displeased that ‘any Academical Honours [could be] prostituted to a common Mountebank, who is punishable by the Laws of the Land’. Jones considers the man concerned, who is being granted a degree by ‘Royal Mandate’, a quack. Others at Cambridge feel the same way. He blames the Royal College of Physicians for forcing the university to grant degrees to unqualified candidates. Jones suggests that future cases should be forwarded to the university Senate and Vice-Chancellor for consideration. Henry Jones was a scientific editor. He was a graduate of Eton College and studied at King’s College, Cambridge. In 1716 he graduated BA, gained his MA in 1720, and was elected a Fellow of the College. He edited a two-volume edition of the Philosophical Transactions for the years 1700-1720. Jones was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1723. He died in London, unmarried, in 1727 (Gordon Goodwin, Jones, Henry (c.16951727), rev. Robert Brown, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004 [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/15011, accessed 15 Aug 2013]).




Patient Details